Where Have All the Preachers Gone?

I graduated from the School of Religion at Bob Jones University in 1987. In those days, the administration publically declared “training preachers is what we do best” and many agreed with the sentiment. Despite its reputation, the “Preacher Boys” class at my school has shown a steady downward trend in enrollment.

In the last 15 years two Bible colleges in the Upper Midwest closed their doors. Pillsbury Baptist Bible College in Owatonna, Minnesota, and Northland Baptist Bible College in Dunbar, Wisconsin, no longer exist. Once fertile training grounds for the next generation of Bible pastors, teachers, and missionaries, the schools could not sustain existence primarily because of a lack of students. History tells us of multiple institutions of higher learning that still exist but no longer specialize or show interest in training people for vocational ministry.

I do not believe the problem resides in the halls of academia; I believe the problem resides within the walls of our churches.

Last weekend our church celebrated and recognized what few churches experience. We ordained a man to the ministry of the gospel. We’ve watched Chris for years and found his life exemplary. We’ve listened to his sermons and Bible lessons and found his teaching faithful to our Lord. We’ve witnessed his love for the Lord, the church, and the world and determined the call he claims from our Lord is genuine.

Following the Sunday worship where our church “set aside” Chris in a custom we call ordination, a woman in her 20s and new to our church said to me, “That was amazing. I’ve never seen that before!” Think about it, here’s a lifelong Christian, raised in the Christian community, and in two decades she’s never seen her church identify one of its own as the next recognized by the church as one called by our Lord to handle his Word and lead the next generation of Christians.

The problem is not that Bible colleges, Christian universities, and seminaries are not producing enough graduates. The problem is the local church is not praying for, planning to train, and promoting the vocation of the ministry of the Word. There are fewer students in our seminaries because our churches are not sending them.

It is true that the pastors at my home church were powerfully influential in my entering vocational ministry, but they were not the first to suggest I consider the call of the Lord. Ed the electrician and Don the truck driver were two men in my home church. Apart from each other, they planted the thought in my young mind that ministry might be in my future. They weren’t control freaks, and neither of them pursued education farther than high school, but both of them loved the Lord and loved his church. Both of them thought it good to encourage a kid to give thought to a lifetime of handling the word of God. The first to inspire me to do what I do today were not pastors or elders or missionaries but two labor union guys who saw a kid in their church, thought, “Maybe,” and acted upon it. When the time for my ordination came, those two men witnessed me accept my responsibility. I doubt they recognized the impact they had on me or took any credit, but that fact remains, they pushed the first domino.

There are many actions our churches can take to encourage vocational ministry. For example, we can give young men the opportunity to teach and preach, show up when we know they are scheduled to teach or preach (not stay away because it’s not the real pastor preaching), and be willing to endure their early stabs at handling the Scriptures, attempts that probably won’t remind of you of John MacArthur, Alistair Begg, Charles Stanley, or Paul Tripp.

We could commit to funding their seminary education like so many denominations do. For example, did you know that a man who is a member of a Southern Baptist Church receives a scholarship equivalent to 50% of the cost of tuition upon entering a Southern Baptist seminary? In the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis, the archdiocese pays for the room and board cost of seminarians preparing for the priesthood. I know of nothing remotely close to that kind of support in the independent church.

An action we can and should pursue is to encourage the young men in our church to consider training for ministry. If we see a boy, a high school student, or a college young man who displays Christian character, whose love for the church is apparent, and who seems always to gravitate to the Bible, we should put in front of him the possibility of becoming a pastor / teacher in the church. How else will it happen? Do you expect God to give the boy a vision in the night? Is God supposed to write it in the sky? Should we hope the kid gets an otherworldly text message or Snapchat imploring him to pick up the mantle of the gospel? Of course not! The impetus comes from the church.

Jesus said, “pray for laborers.” Chris was the most recent that we have had the privilege to ordain, but there is no guarantee of another. We must pray that the Lord of the Harvest would send laborers into the harvest from our church. We must pray that our church would be the kind of soil that grows laborers. We must pray that the next in the chain of succession of Bible preachers does not get sidetracked by a love for this world.

There are many wonderful moments in the life of a local church. From baptisms to weddings to baby dedications and so much more, we share joyful experiences. Hardly anything tops when a local church sees one of its own take up the charge to preach the Word. I hope you will see many more of them.

As always I welcome your feedback and any ideas you might have for an upcoming Lunchtime Musing.

My Thumbs for Blessing or Cursing

Admittedly, I was resistant at first. I didn’t get the whole point of sending a text to someone. Why revert to archaic communication of sending written words when I can just call? To me texting was a kind of modern day telegraph. I thought the whole point of cell phones was that I can talk to somebody right now if I want to. If I need to say something to my kids or if my wife needs to say something to me, just call me on your cell phone. That’s why you have them, right? Well, that didn’t last long. Like many of you, I find myself reading texts and sending texts all the time, thousands of them in a month. My kids have now advanced to other social media apps leaving me in the “texting was so 2015" world.

Only nerds and people familiar with Area 51 knew what email was prior to AOL. Unfamiliar with AOL? It stands for America Online and was the avenue for how most of us entered the world of the internet and email back in the 1990s. Most of us who were online had an email address that ended in @aol.com. Email became a great way to connect with past friends, exchange pictures with family almost instantly without a trip to Walgreens and a postage stamp, and a means to interact with people in ways never before possible. It was all good until we discovered the dark side of electronic communication.

I thank the Lord for the gift of electronic communication. But like all of God’s gifts to humanity, we quickly find ways to use them to serve our flesh. Email, Snapchats, texts, Instagram photos exchanged between family members, friends, and Christian brothers and sisters can be sources of great joy. They also can be sources of significant sin. When electronic communication becomes the means by which parties engage in relational matters, the potential for fleshy exchanges soars. Electronic communication simply cannot and should not be our means of airing grievances, expressing hurts, making judgments, or venting feelings. It is so easy to say things in electronic format that we would never say to someone’s face. It is so easy for the recipient to read into the lines of text something that was not intended. We can hide behind keyboards in cyber-anonymity feeling good that we sent a salvo destined for someone’s three inch by five inch screen. We can ignore someone’s electronic communication and never deal with issues. I find it hard to accept that our Lord’s instructions for solving problems in Matthew 18 or Luke 17 or Paul’s words in Galatians 6 can be accomplished in electronic format.

Social media has only magnified both the opportunities for good and the potential of the flesh. A Twitter tweet or a Facebook status update can bring glory to God and be good for people or bring shame to the name of Christ and damage once sweet relationships.

Therefore, I want to make some pastoral suggestions to you about using electronic communication in your relationships.

  • Do use electronic communication to say I love you, I’m thinking of you, or I’m praying for you. Do not use electronic communication to say I hate you, I don’t want to see you ever again, or I want nothing to do with you.
  • Do use electronic communication to express thanks. Do not use electronic communication to express a complaint, to vent feelings, or manipulate the reader.
  • Do use electronic communication to share God’s blessings on your life.Do not use electronic communication to convey your grievances about how you have been treated by the recipient or others.
  • Do use electronic communication to affirm in another. Do not use electronic communication to accuse another.
  • Do use electronic communication to arrange times to meet for the purpose of developing relationships or mending relationships. Do not use electronic communication in the place of face-to-face meetings that develop relationships or mend relationships.

I suppose the list of suggested do’s and don’ts could continue for a while, but you get the point. Let’s allow the Scriptures to control this area of our communication as well. The Bible says, Let the words of my mouth and the meditations of my heart be acceptable in Your sight, o Lord, my strength and my Redeemer (Psalm 19:14). That, of course, includes my electronic words and thoughts.

As always I welcome your feedback and any ideas you might have for an upcoming Lunchtime Musing.

A Snowy View of What Is to Come

People worldwide love the Olympics. From the thrill of victory to the agony of defeat, the Olympic Games showcase athletes and their stories, countries and their histories.

For those of us old enough to remember, during the Cold War the Olympic Games were a huge matter of national pride. Everyone knew the roster for the Soviet hockey team consisted of men who played professionally, a no-no back in the day when Olympic athletes really were amateurs. So when our college boys took down the mighty Soviet team on the home ice of Lake Placid during the 1980 Olympics, we heartily chanted, “U-S-A, U-S-A.” We were Americans. These were our athletes.

Any time an American athlete ascends the podium to receive the gold medal and the orchestra plays our national anthem, for a few brief moments, it feels like we really are one nation, as if unity identifies who we are as a people. But the moment quickly wanes, and we return to the status quo of a fractured people. We wish the unity remained.

There is a victory that has made the unity of humanity possible. Paul spoke of Jesus’ victory over sin, death, and the grave (1 Corinthians 15:53-57). His resurrection is the culmination of the gospel where He made from every tribe, tongue, people, and nation, one community of the redeemed (Romans 15:5-6; 1 Corinthians 12:11-13). If there is to be any unity, harmony, agreement, peace, or goodwill among nations, churches, marriages, and families, it will only come as the individuals in those communities unite around the person and work of Jesus Christ. Every other idea promoting unity fades quickly.

The medal ceremony is a moving event in the Olympics. How marvelous the moment must be for the athlete when he receives his gold medal followed by the playing of his national anthem. If the athlete is fortunate enough to win on his home soil, all the better, then the crowd rises to its feet and sings with him the song of his country. Thousands of voices singing as one for the glory that is their homeland.

In a similar way this is our experience when we gather to worship together. All the voices of the redeemed rise and sing as one the song of our victor, Jesus Christ. From Crown Him with Many Crowns to The Power of the Cross and scores of tunes and texts in between, we declare our oneness because of the victory Jesus achieved. When we gather to worship, we declare to Him, we are one in You, and when we gather to worship, we declare to each other, we are unified in Him.

Enjoy the remaining few days of the Olympics. There is certain to be some great story or event still to come. Enjoy the feeling of being an American when one of our athletes wins and feel a sense of national pride. These experiences and feelings are a shadow of what we will know when all the redeemed of all the ages gather around the throne of the victorious Jesus and sing together, Worthy is the Lamb!

As always I welcome your feedback and any ideas you might have for an upcoming Lunchtime Musing.

This Musing first appeared in February 2014 as the world gathered in Sochi, Russia, for the XXII Olympic Winter Games.

When a Christian University Forgets Its Mission

Last weekend was as big as it gets for the Twin Cities. We hosted the Super Bowl, and by most accounts the myriad of events went off without a hitch. In the list of parties and programs surrounding the game was a concert held at rented facilities on the campus of Bethel University in St. Paul. What follows is my letter to the adminstration for its failure to protect the name of Christ and its students.

Office of the President
Bethel University
3900 Bethel Drive
St. Paul, MN 55112

February 5, 2018

President Barnes,

Greetings in the name of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. I write to you with a heavy heart and a measure of emotion. That Bethel University hosted an event headlined by Snoop Dogg raises serious questions about the capacity of the administration to execute the mission of Bethel University.

I have read Bethel’s Community Announcement (Jan 29, 2018) where the administration attempts to distance itself from the performers at the NFL’s Super Bowl Gospel Celebration, “Bethel does not get involved in the specific content of any events staged by rental groups, including this one.” The disclaimer appears in the same paragraph as “this year’s headline performer will be Snoop Dogg.” One can only assume the necessity to issue a statement is directly tied to the presence of Snoop Dogg.

Further, in the same announcement you openly encourage participation, even providing a hyperlink, when you inform the students, faculty, and staff “a limited number of tickets are still available through Ticketmaster if you would like to attend.”

In other words, “We can’t help it that the NFL picked Snoop Dogg to perform in our premier performance venue built by the generous and sacrificial donations of Christians worldwide, and we’re pretty sure he won’t drop any F-bombs, rap about female genitalia, or use the N word or the B word or the S word or any of those other bad words he uses. So, don’t go if you think you might be offended, but if you’re not offended by those words and if you think it’s really cool that a misogynistic, vulgar, pot smoking, ‘gangsta business’ kind of guy is droppin’ it on our campus, then here’s the link to snag some swag.”

It is disingenuous to ask your constituents to shrug their shoulders because Bethel does not offer oversight to the specific content of rental groups. You have a responsibility to promote the mission of Bethel University when renting to outside organizations. You have a responsibility to the alumni who continue to support the university to continue in the Christian tradition of the previous decades. You have a responsibility to the students to bring to the campus Christ-honoring entertainment. You have a responsibility to protect the female members of the community from the abusive ideology of Snoop Dogg’s music. Rightly, you would not allow the content of neo-Nazis or Planned Parenthood. What could you possibly have been thinking to give the NFL carte blanche approval for any performer they desired without any oversight from your administration?

Do I need to list the problems with Snoop Dogg performing at a Christian University? Did you cringe when you heard Snoop Dogg would perform? Did you attempt to stop the performance when you became aware of it? When Bethel University signed the rental agreement with the NFL, did your administration gain assurances that your expectations as a Christian University would be met?

Boldly informed and motivated by the Christian faith, Bethel University educates and energizes men and women for excellence in leadership, scholarship, and service. Because we are deeply committed to our mission as a religiously affiliated center for higher education, all rental guests must utilize the university’s facilities and conduct themselves in a manner consistent with Bethel’s mission and values.

For the last seventeen years I have served our church and the community of Inver Grove Heights. In my efforts to reach the community, I have become friends with many administrators, faculty, and staff at our local schools. Last Friday afternoon one of them said to me, “Yeah, Snoop Dogg is going to be at Bethel tonight and with the strippers tomorrow night!”

I was stunned and asked what he was talking about. This unsaved man informed me of what was happening on the Bethel campus. I stuttered in my response thinking his words could not possibly be true. Certainly, a high school student told him something social media had manufactured. I was wrong.

Friday night of Super Bowl weekend, Snoop Dogg performed something vaguely religious in the Benson Great Hall.

Saturday night of Super Bowl weekend, Snoop Dogg worked as the DJ for Playboy’s Big Game Weekend Party in Minneapolis.

I can only assume on campus venues were not available for Saturdaynight’s event since “Bethel does not get involved in the specific content of any events staged by rental groups.”

How is it that an unsaved man without the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit can see the problem with this, but the administration of Bethel University cannot? This unconverted man laughed when telling his Christian pastor friend that arguably the leading, evangelical Christian higher education institution in the Twin Cities hosted an event featuring Snoop Dogg. I suspect you set back the work of the gospel with this man and so many others farther than any of us know. May God have mercy on you and those who need the gospel.

The failure of Bethel’s administration to exercise righteous stewardship for the resources God has given the university requires a statement from your office and scrutiny from the Bethel University Board of Trustees.

Grace to you.

Rev. Dr. Michael VerWay
First Calvary Baptist Church
Inver Grove Heights, MN

As always I welcome your feedback and any ideas you might have for an upcoming Lunchtime Musing.

Abortion, Slavery & Wilberforce

William Wilberforce fought against slavery for twenty years. To state the matter differently, Wilberforce witnessed the import and practice of buying and selling human beings as normative in Great Britain nearly the whole of his life. As a member of parliament, he led the campaign to end the immoral and vulgar practice. For nineteen years his efforts did not produce the outcome he desired. I’ll return to Wilberforce later.

Lost in the mist of the political fog in the United States was a procedural vote Monday in the U.S. Senate. Needing sixty votes to move a bill that would ban abortion after twenty weeks gestation, supporters gained only fifty-one votes. Three democrats cast yes votes while two republicans voted no. Our two Minnesota senators, Amy Klobuchar and Tina Smith, voted no without comment to the press or their constituents.

For decades abortion providers and proponents have said abortion needs to be available to all women as a matter of modern healthcare. They argue women who have conceived because of rape should not be forced to carry the child to term. They argue a woman whose life is endangered by a pregnancy should not be forced to carry the child to term. For the record, both of these exceptions were included in the bill previously passed by the U.S. House of Representatives and rejected Monday by the senate.

The fact remains abortion providers and proponents will accept nothing less than abortion on demand without any restrictions. The slogan of those who promote the infanticide of children in the womb is that abortions should be rare, safe, and legal. This is not true. While they may be legal in the US, they are neither rare nor safe. A human being always dies in an abortion. A mother always bears the scar in her soul that she killed her baby. Society always loses a gift from God.

Today, abortion providers will kill 3,315 human beings in a mother’s womb.

Abortion on demand without restriction is the official position of the Democrat party. Their position embraces partial birth abortion and rejects parental notification. Their position advocates the federal government supplies and distributes condoms for all so that consenting persons may have sex whenever and with whomever they want.

Should a pregnancy occur, they have a solution for that. No woman should be forced to carry or to care for a child she does not want. For reference U.S. abortion laws are consistent with only seven nations on the planet. On this issue we look more like China and North Korea than Uganda or Peru.

When asked to defend the position, politicians raise the straw man argument of rape, incest, and life of the mother. The facts are these: abortions because of rape are 3/10 of 1% of all abortions. Abortions because of incest are 3/100 of 1% of all abortions. Abortions because of the safety of the life of the mother are 1/10 of 1%. Together, these are less than ½ of 1% of the abortions performed in the US. The fact is 99% of abortions are purely elective. For whatever reason (and there are many), the mother determines that she does not want this baby, and she finds a medical professional who will kill her baby for her.

Members of the U.S. House of Representatives and at least fifty-one members of the U.S. Senate are trying to put an end to this. They face stiff opposition.

It has been 45 years since the Roe v. Wade SCOTUS decision. Little by little some states and portions of the federal government have chipped away at the legal standing that allows the killing of human beings in the womb. To date seventeen states ban abortions after twenty weeks.

Back to Wilberforce, he won election to the English parliament in 1784. In the coming year he came into contact with John Newton of Amazing Grace fame and soon was born again after hearing the gospel. He was a new man and took up the cause to stop slave trade making initial political moves in 1787. The next two decades of his life were given to that single cause. Year after year, the politics of failed votes, broken agreements, and setbacks marked his endeavors until the passage of the Slave Trade Act in 1807, twenty full years after he began.

The fight to end abortion in the United States continues. We’ve been at it for a very long time. Brave and bold women and men continue to stand against the economics of abortion and the immorality of abortion just like Wilberforce stood against the economics of the slave trade and the immorality of the slave trade. We have witnessed incremental movement away from the wickedness that is the taking of life in the womb. I pray we will see the end of the taking of life in the womb just as Wilberforce saw the end of the slave trade.

As heaven was on the side of Wilberforce so heaven is on the side of those who stand to protect the lives of the yet to be born. Let’s allow Wilberforce’s example to inspire us. He was a Christian who led the charge, and likely, Christians will lead the charge against abortion. And let’s remember God’s Word.

Galatians 6:9 And let us not grow weary of doing good, for in due season we will reap, if we do not give up.  

As always I welcome your feedback and any ideas you might have for an upcoming Lunchtime Musing.